CONSIDER WESLEY
The “Culture Wars” of the last
several decades have pitted those who think of America as fundamentally a
Christian nation against those who see America as essentially secular. Hosts of
books and internet sites purport to prove one side or the other by selectively
quoting from America’s founders or various court decisions. And there is an
abundance of quotations available for both sides to use, often from the same
founder!
The reason the founders are so
helpful to both sides of the debate is not that they were confused about their
beliefs. It is that the two sides are partly right and partly wrong. American
founders assumed a basic morality derived from their Judeo-Christian heritage,
and most believed in a Creator who providentially guided human events. Most
also were devoted to the ideals of the eighteenth century Enlightenment, which
was philosophically grounded in human reason rather than God’s revelation. Most
thought of themselves as Christians, but were far from orthodox, and, certainly
not evangelical. Many had a deistic God, but one who was nonetheless involved
in human events in a real though non-miraculous way. They were not secularists
in the sense of, say, modern France; that is to say that did not believe
religion should be banned from the public square. But
at the same time most were leery of establishing an official state religion,
and advocated freedom of religious belief and practice.
John Wesley was a priest in the
established church in England. Like his parents, he was devoted to the Church
of England and not at all opposed to its being the national church. At the same
time, he strongly supported the legal toleration of Dissenting churches—at
least those that were Protestant—and opposed
persecution of persons for their beliefs. He was as strong an advocate of
English liberty as any American colonist. But he had a much higher view of the
monarchy as the protector of those liberties than did the revolutionaries
across the Atlantic.
Wesley had distinctive views on
what actually constitutes a Christian nation. In his 1744 sermon “Scriptural
Christianity”—the last sermon he was ever invited to give at Oxford—he begins
his “plain, practical application” with this question: “Where, I pray, do the
Christians live? Which is the country, the inhabitants whereof are ‘all…filled
with the Holy Ghost’?...cannot suffer one among them
to ‘lack anything,’ but continually give ‘to every man as he hath need’? Who
one and all have the love of God filling their hearts, and constraining them to
love their neighbor as themselves?.... With what
propriety can we term any a Christian country which
does not answer this description? Why then, let us confess we have never yet
seen a Christian country upon earth” (§IV. 1).
For Wesley, a Christian nation is
one whose people exhibit in their dispositions and actions the marks of the new
birth, most especially love for God and neighbor. In other words, they manifest
holiness of heart and life. Wesley believed this would not only impact personal
attitudes and relationships in the narrow sense, but would characterize more
broadly the life of communities and the nation itself.
This was a perspective Wesley
continued to have throughout his life. In his 1783 sermon “The General Spread
of the Gospel,” he asks what acquaintance the western churches have with
holiness and happiness. “Put Papists and Protestants, French and English
together, the bulk of one and of the other nation; and what manner of
Christians are they? Are they ‘holy as He that hath called them is holy?’ Are
they filled with ‘righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost?’ Is
there “that mind in them which was also in Christ Jesus?’
And do they ‘walk as Christ also walked?’ Nay, they are as far from it as hell
is from heaven!” (§7).
Things do not have to be this
way, of course. In fact, in the later sermon Wesley insists God is renewing
persons in love such that in the end the entire creation will reflect God’s
holiness.
But what he also reminds us is
akin to what Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount. Being faithful to God is
not a matter of grudging obedience or meeting minimal moral requirements—it
requires a heart transformed by God. Wesley was certainly concerned that
nations have moral laws, and would halve welcomed a law that made slavery
illegal. But what in the end makes a nation Christian is not its laws but the
hearts and lives of its citizens.
By Henry H. Knight III, Donald and Pearl
Wright Professor
of Wesleyan Studies, Saint Paul School of Theology.