Home
Welcome
to Catalyst on-line. United Methodist (UM) seminarians have been receiving
Catalyst in their mail boxes since 1973.
What is Catalyst?
Four
issues of Catalyst are mailed each academic year to some 5,000 UM theological
students in more than 100 seminaries in the U.S.A.
AFTE
Catalyst
is a project of A Foundation for Theological Education (AFTE).
What is the John Wesley Fellowship Program?
Each
year AFTE awards up to five John Wesley Fellowships to assist gifted United
Methodists in their doctoral studies at the finest universities.
Back Issues
Several
back issues of Catalyst are now available on-line.
Subscriptions
Subscription
is free for UM seminarians, and is available to all others for $5 per year.
|
CONSIDER WESLEY
Wesley’s doctrine of prevenient grace was his solution to a problem inherent
in two central teachings of Protestantism. The first was original sin, which
in Wesley’s day was under attack by influential advocates of human free will
such as John Taylor. The longest single essay written by Wesley was a strong
defense of the doctrine of original sin. He then turned the first part of
the essay into the sermon “Original Sin” (1759).
In the sermon he insists on “the entire depravation of the whole human nature”;
humans are “wholly fallen” and “totally corrupted.” Wesley saw this view of
human nature as essential to genuine Christianity: “Allow this, and you are
so far a Christian. Deny it, and you are but a heathen still” (§ III.
1&2, in Sermons II, ed., A.C. Outler [Abingdon, 1985] 183-84).
Clearly this was a doctrinal essential for Wesley.
He likens original sin to a terminal disease that has us in its grip. All
our faculties are affected—our hearts are so governed by sin that we are not
capable of knowing God or changing our lives; our vision is so clouded by
sin we are unaware that we have a problem. We lack both power and knowledge.
Hence the necessity of the second Protestant teaching: salvation is by grace
alone. We cannot save ourselves, so only God can save us. This God had done
this through Jesus Christ. For Wesley, the two doctrines fit together; to
deny the first was effectively to deny the second.
But herein lies a problem. If our only contribution to our situation is
to make matters worse, then clearly we can have no role in our own salvation.
God seemingly must do it all. Moreover, God’s grace must be irresistible because,
given our sinful condition, we would be certain to resist if given the chance.
Yet if grace is irresistible, and not everyone is saved, it is likewise clear
that God must have chosen those who will be saved, and by implication those
who will not be. The only other alternative would be universal salvation.
Not everyone found this to be a problem, of course. The Calvinists of Wesley’s
day saw irresistible grace and predestination as a manifestation of God’s
sovereignty. In this God is glorified, both by mercifully and graciously saving
some, and justly condemning others for their sins. Wesley was not persuaded.
While he certainly had a high view of God’s agency and power, sovereignty
was not God’s most important attribute. As he said in his commentary of 1
John 4:8, “God is often styled holy, righteous, wise; but not holiness, righteousness,
or wisdom...as he is said to be love; intimating that this is...his reigning
attribute, the attribute that sheds and amiable glory on all his other perfections”
(Explanatory Notes on the New Testament).
The Calvinist position was troubling to Wesley because it raised serious
questions about the character of God. It also contradicted the clear teaching
of Scripture that God seeks to save everyone, and that Christ died for all.
Prevenient grace (or “preventing grace”) was Wesley’s theological response
to this dilemma. While all are indeed dead in sin and in themselves unable
to respond to God, no one is entirely without the grace of God. Working in
every human life, prevenient grace includes “the first wish to please God,
the first dawn of light concerning his will, and the first slight transient
conviction of having sinned against him” (“On Working out Our Own Salvation,”
§ II.1, in A. C. Outler, Sermons III [Abingdon, 1986] 203). Prevenient
grace restores in each person a small measure of freedom, enabling them to
respond to God’s initiative.
It was prevenient grace that allowed Wesley to insist, at one and the same
time, salvation is by grace alone and God offers salvation to everyone. It
also allowed Wesley to emphasize divine agency without diminishing the importance
of human freedom. Prevenient grace does not take away our freedom, it restores
it; it is not irresistible but enabling.
It is because prevenient grace gives us a measure of moral freedom that
God holds us responsible for sin. We are without excuse, not because of our
condition of original sin, but because we do not use the grace we have (cf.
“On Working out Our Own Salvation,” § III.4, 207).
But we are also not without hope. God has opened the way to new life for
everyone, and is inviting all to respond. All may come to know God’s love
in Jesus Christ, and all may be renewed in that love.
By Dr. Henry H. Knight III, E. Stanley Jones Professor of Evangelism
at Saint Paul School of Theology, Kansas City, Missouri.
|